Legislature(1995 - 1996)
01/16/1996 01:07 PM House CRA
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 392 - NATIVE CORP DIRECTOR CLASSIFICATION Number 429 CO-CHAIR IVAN noted the bill packets contained a copy of HB 392; the sponsor statement; two zero fiscal notes, one from the Department of Community and Regional Affairs and one from the Department of Commerce and Economic Development; a letter from Glen Price of Foster Pepper & Shefelman explaining the intent of the bill; and resolutions in support from Napaskiak Incorporated and Swan Lake Corporation. As sponsor of the legislation, he asked Tom Wright to present the bill on his behalf. Number 477 TOM WRIGHT, Legislative Assistant to Representative Ivan, presented the sponsor statement for HB 392, explaining it amends the Alaska corporations code to authorize Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) village corporations to provide for Board of Director classification in their bylaws. If enacted, HB 392 would allow ANCSA village corporations to amend their articles of incorporation to authorize a classified or staggered term board of directors by a majority vote of the shares represented at a meeting of shareholders. Under current law, for those villages which did not have classified boards in place by July 1, 1989, such an amendment requires a two-thirds vote of all outstanding shares entitled to vote, which is often difficult for village corporations to achieve. Number 564 REPRESENTATIVE PETE KOTT asked if there were only two village corporations to which HB 392 applied. MR. WRIGHT responded that they were aware of only two, Napaskiak and Swan Lake; however, there could be others. REPRESENTATIVE KOTT asked if they knew the reason why, prior to 1989, those corporations did not have a classified board in place. MR. WRIGHT suggested that Glen Price, representative for Napaskiak and Swan Lake, could better answer the question. CO-CHAIR IVAN added that the legislation was intended to assist village corporations that incur costs in executing annual shareholder meetings. Shareholders attended by proxy and in person, but the statutes required a two-thirds majority of all shareholders to amend the articles and bylaws. He deferred to Glen Price to answer technical questions. Number 686 GLEN PRICE, Foster Pepper & Shefelman, representing Napaskiak Incorporated and Swan Lake Corporation, testified via teleconference from Anchorage, saying he was unaware of why the corporations had no classified boards before 1989. He had represented Napaskiak and Swan Lake for two or three years. The corporations had attempted to address the issue at their last two annual meetings, but had only obtained a majority vote at each meeting, not the two-thirds vote required to amend articles. He added there were probably other corporations to which HB 392 would apply, but he did not know which corporations had classified boards. He thought polling Native corporation villages might be required to obtain that information, which was not on file with the Department of Commerce and Economic Development. Number 760 REPRESENTATIVE KOTT asked Mr. Price if the villages having classified boards in place prior to 1989 required a simple majority vote. MR. PRICE responded that he thought so; before July 1, 1989, it could be in the bylaws. Because a board could have amended the bylaws, he thought boards rather than shareholders of most corporations had enacted the change. Number 819 CO-CHAIR IVAN clarified that in no way did the legislation attempt to alter the checks and balances in place. However, the majority of small communities had five directors, each up for election every year. In the case of Napaskiak and Swan Lake, they were trying to expand the number of directors and institute staggered terms to provide continuity. REPRESENTATIVE KOTT asked whether HB 392 would affect regional corporations. MR. PRICE confirmed that it would not. He said it specifically referenced village corporations only. Number 908 REPRESENTATIVE KIM ELTON noted that the language of July 1, 1989, was highly specific. He asked Mr. Price what the history of the 1989 language was and why it was included. MR. PRICE responded that July 1, 1989, was the effective date of the corporations code currently in place. Prior to that, corporations could provide for classified boards in their bylaws. Under the new code, there must be authority in the articles if there was no classified board before July 1, 1989. For pre- existing corporations, as of July 1, 1989, they needed a two-thirds vote to amend the articles. However, he said, those corporations cannot even get two-thirds attendance at a meeting. REPRESENTATIVE ELTON wanted to know if there had been discussion of the difference between treatment of village corporations existing before and after 1989. MR. PRICE responded he was unaware of such discussion. CO-CHAIR IVAN asked if there were any further comments or questions from the committee. Hearing none, he indicated he wanted to consider passing the bill from committee. Number 1109 CO-CHAIR ALAN AUSTERMAN moved that HB 392 move from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|